Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (RIA Novosti/Vladimir Astapkovich) |
“No one has any appetite for intervention.
Behind the scenes, I have a feeling they are praying that
Russia and China go on blocking intervention, as
sanctioning it would mean they must act – and they
are not ready,” Lavrov told journalists on a
flight back to Moscow from an EU summit in Brussels.
The FM was assessing the current mood in the UN Security
Council after NATO cleared the stationing of Patriot
missiles in Turkey. Ankara and the alliance say this is a
containment tool to prevent any further Syrian violence
from spilling over the border, but political analysts
believe the step might signal the West and their Middle
East allies are preparing to intervene in Syria.
Chemical weapons ‘so far’ secured, but US needs to ‘decide on priorities’
Syria’s chemical arsenal remains one of the major international concerns since the topic first emerged in July. Lavrov says that President Bashar Assad’s government is doing whatever’s possible to secure the weapons.
“So far, the arsenal is under control. The
Syrian authorities have gathered all the stock in one or
two locations. It used to be scattered all over the
country,” the FM said adding that Moscow and
Washington’s intelligence agree on the matter.
Syria is reportedly in possession of nerve agents, including mustard gas, as well as the Scud missiles needed to deliver them. The country is a non-signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, which outlaws their production.
Since July, Assad’s government has repeatedly stated
that chemical weapons will not be used on Syria, but
Syrian officials have not excluded the possibility they
might be deployed in the event of “a foreign
attack.”
The threat has drawn international condemnation.
The EU, US and many others are also worried that
Syria’s chemical weapons might fall into the hands
of the Syrian rebels, some of whom have links to
Al-Qaeda.
But Lavrov pointed out at some inconsistency in Washington’s approach where the chemical arsenal issues overlap with US support for the Syrian opposition.
“Our American partners admit that the main threat is rebels seizing the chemical arsenal. The opposition forces include all kinds of groups even ones the US has recently proclaimed terror groups. We tell them: ‘Guys but you support the opposition and its armed struggle. This armed struggle might result in exactly what you fear. You decide on your priorities.’ But there is no clear response to that,” said Lavrov.
‘No one will win this war’
Russia refuses to act as an intermediary trying to Assad
into fleeing, Lavrov also said. At the same time Moscow is
not going to accommodate the Syrian president should he
step down: “Assad is not going anywhere, no
matter what anyone says, be it China or
Russia.”
On being asked whether the rebels will eventually oust
President Assad, Lavrov replied: “Listen, no one
is going to win this war.”
The situation in Syria remains volatile with new deaths
reported daily by human rights groups. According to those
reports, the death toll in the country which has been
engulfed in the civil unrest since March 2011 has exceeded
40,000 people. The UN Human Rights Committee also says the
conflict made 164,000 refugees.
Moscow insists the Syrian conflict should be resolved
through direct and unconditional negotiations between the
government and opposition. Russia insists the country
should be given the right to self-determination and
neither side should be supported.
The US, the UK, France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and a number
of other countries in the West and the Middle East, on the
other hand, call on President Assad to step down
immediately and grant financial and military support to
the Syrian opposition forces. But despite all the support,
the Syrian National Coalition which was deemed to become
an umbrella for all the Syrian opposition groups still
failed to unify Assad's opponents and therefore does not
have leverage on all the forces fighting the
goverment’s troops on the ground.
The UN says the Syrian war is growing more sectarian than civic with each day and that there is no end in sight to the conflict.